In our name the most unspeakable atrocities have been committed regardless of the other sides’ responsibility for the war. To us, this performance [Crossing the Line] was a path towards self-healing and reconciliation with our own people and with people from our former homeland. We are those, who were vulnerable, who felt guilty and who trans- formed our feeling of guilt into a feeling of responsibility. We are the ones, who lived here and did not support what was happening, but our voices have not been heard. We had an enormous need for our voices to be heard in the name of all those people who had not agreed to and who didn’t support what was happening. It is the power of theatre to give that voice, to give voice to the voiceless.Dah sees itself as a theatre that can open doors to victims to seek justice; it is also a space where people can reconsider their views. As a theatre, it employs techniques that allow the crossing of borders between the rational and the irra- tional, and between reality and metaphor: these techniques inherent to transfor- mational and devised theatre can at times open up a much larger space for potential reconciliation than formal justice mechanisms. Through its work, Dah crosses not only ethnic lines, but also more insidious lines that divide people, who hold opposing or antagonistic views on a range of crucial matters. Dah’s aim is to maintain direct contact with its audience.