”parents emerged from Kim’s analysis than did “supportive” parents. “Easygoing” were similar innumber as “tigers,” and the fewest parents were deemed “harsh.” Kim also measured the outcomesfor each of her categories. Supportive parents had the best developmental outcomes, as measured byacademic achievement, educational attainment, family obligation, well-being (considered positiveoutcomes), academic pressure, depressive symptoms, and parent-child alienation (considerednegative). Children of easygoing parents were second in outcomes, while tiger moms produced kidswho felt more alienated from their parents and experienced higher instances of depressivesymptoms. They also had lower GPAs, despite feeling more academic pressure.In the end, then, Kim finds that these immigrant moms and dads are not that different fromAmerican parents with European ancestry. Kim said, “Our data shows Tiger parenting producesdetrimental effects, inhibiting child development. Unfortunately, tiger children’s GPA’s anddepressive symptoms are similar to those whose parents who are very harsh. Tiger parenting doesn’tproduce superior outcomes in kids.”