Evidence is provided here for the r

Evidence is provided here for the reliability and validity of the SQLS, a novel schizo-phrenia-specific QoL measure. Content validity has been addressed by developing items on the basis of in-depth interviews, rather than relying on the literature or clinical scales in this field. The content of the questionnaire addresses experiences of importance to individuals with the disorder. Items that were criticised by respondents as being meaningless or ambiguous were removed. Internal consistency reliabilities of the three scale domains incorporated in the measure have been shown to be high, and all items in each scale correlate well with the overall scale score. Construct validity was explored by correlation of the scales of the SQLS with established psychiatric self-report measures and the SF-36. Results suggest that the measure is addressing areas related, but not identical, to those of previously existing measures.

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

此處提供了 SQLS 的可靠性和有效性的證據，這是一種新型的特定于 schizo-phrenia 的 QoL 測量值。內容有效性已經通過在深入訪談的基礎上開發專案來解決，而不是依賴于該領域的文獻或臨床尺度。調查問卷的內容涉及對患有疾病的個人非常重要的經驗。被答覆者批評為毫無意義或模棱兩可的專案被刪除。該度量納入的三個比例域的內部一致性相關性已被證明很高，並且每個比例表中的所有專案都與總體比例分數密切相關。通過 SQLS 的尺度與已建立的精神病自我報告度量和 SF-36 的相關性來探討構造有效性。結果表明，這項措施涉及與以前現有措施有關的領域，但並非相同。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

本文提供了新的精神分裂症患者生活質量量表（SQLS）的信度和效度的證據。內容效度是通過在深入訪談的基礎上開發專案來解决的，而不是依賴於該領域的文獻或臨床量表。調查問卷的內容涉及到對患者有重要意義的經歷。被調查者責備為毫無意義或模棱兩可的項目被删除。該量表中三個量表域的內部一致性信度均較高，各量表項均與總分有較好的相關性。採用量表、自述量表和SF-36量表對構念效度進行研究。結果表明，這項措施所涉及的領域與以往現有措施有關，但並不完全相同。