The training began from the previous review, but there was a missing in the text on the way of reviewing.
A lecturer surprisingly "Kumano, can you explain here?"
It is good to explain, but it says to explain while solving an example on a narrow white board ... ( '' s `)
We read through the text in advance, but I did not look through all the details well.
I made a perfect mistake. _ | ¯ | ○ ___ SAFETOKEN ___ 0
The poor character of the picture is the character I wrote. Lol
I explained about 25% of the training content.
The lecturer was asked how to guide the official by question from the student.
I did not look it up in advance and obediently answered "I do not know."
The place there is not requested from the lecturer, but I have supplemental explanation.
In addition, there was a sluggishness from the lecturer and I was asked, "Is the formula used for official and prepared problems different, is it different from hoop stress formula?"
It is the 2nd piece of the photo. We omitted the detailed contents (the point of integration: I think that the participant can not understand why it can be defined like that) to the students, but simply explain that the integration will be like this, I explained that the way of guiding and hoop stress is actually this formula.
For the time being, this time I participated in the last training. haha