The crankshaft broke in the Claiman

The crankshaft broke in the Claimant’s mill. He engaged the services of the Defendant to deliver the crankshaft to the place where it was to be repaired and to subsequently return it after it had been repaired. Due to neglect of the Defendant, the crankshaft was returned 7 days late. The Claimant was unable to use the mill during this time and claimed for loss of profit. The Plaintiff sued for damages for the loss of profit that would have been earned if the replacement of crankshaft available on time. The Defendant argued that he was unaware that the mill would have to be closed during the delay and therefore the loss of profit was too remote.

結果 (中文) 1:

曲轴在索赔人的轧机打破了。他从事被告向它需要修理，并随后返回它后它修好的地方提供曲轴的服务。被告的忽视，曲轴返回了晚了 7 天。索赔人是无法在这段时间使用轧机，并声称的利润损失。原告起诉本来如果可以赚取的利润的损失赔偿额的曲轴可用按时更换。被告辩称，他没有意识到，轧机将不得不在延迟期间关闭，因此利润损失太遥远。

結果 (中文) 2:

曲轴在索赔人的磨坏了。他从事被告的服务，提供曲轴它是修复并随后返回它，它已经修复后的地方。由于被告忽视，被送回曲轴晚7天。申请人无法在这段时间内使用轧机和声称的利润损失。起诉要求赔偿损失为本来挣得如果更换曲轴及时提供利润损失的原告。被告辩称，他不知道，该厂将有延迟期间被关闭，因此利润损失是太遥远。