Two models were fit to the data to decide which model offered the most reasonable explanationof ICT acceptance among rural youth entrepreneurs. Additionally, model fit statistics arerevealed in Table 7, findings suggesting that most of the fit indices meet the requirements forSEM analysis; even though the values for GFI and AGFI do not exceed 0.9 (the thresholdvalue), they still meet the requirement proposed by Baumgartner and Homburg (1996): thevalue is satisfactory if above 0.8. The values of RMSEA for these models are under 0.08.The confidence interval (CI) at a 90% level does not include 0.08, meaning that it is not a coinci-dence that RMSEA was less than 0.08; so, the fit indices propose that all of the three modelsprovided a good fit to the data.