D contracted with R to the effect t

D contracted with R to the effect that D would procure a concert to be performed by his wife. D said if R paid D, his wife would perform. His wife became seriously ill on the specified date. Had she gone on with the recital, her life would've been in serious danger. R suffers losses and sues D. The Court held that D was not liable as it was frustrated by his wife's illness, because both parties must have assumed that the performance would only take place if his wife was fit to perform. As reasonable men must have intended, the contract was terminated.

結果 (中文) 1:

D 与 R 签约，大意是 D 将采购一场音乐会，由他的妻子。D 说是否 R 支付 D，他的妻子会执行。在指定的日期，他的妻子得了重病。她已经与独奏音乐会，她的生活会一直处于严重危险之中。R 蒙受损失和起诉 D.法院认为，D 不是承担责任因为它感到沮丧他妻子的病情，因为双方必须有假设如果适合他的妻子，只会性能来执行。作为合理的男人必须有目的，合同被终止了。

結果 (中文) 2:

ð承包了R以使D会促使一个演唱会由他的妻子来执行的效果。ð说，当R支付D，他的妻子将执行。他的妻子成为在指定日期重病。如果她走了与演奏会，她的生活会一直处于严重的危险。 - [R遭受损失和起诉D.法院认为，D组不承担责任，因为它是由他的妻子的病感到沮丧，因为双方必须假定性能只会发生，如果他的妻子是适合履行。至于合理的男人一定有打算，合同终止。